From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mahoney v. McGuire

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 8, 1985
485 N.E.2d 236 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued September 3, 1985

Decided October 8, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Alan Saks, J.

John J. Maguire and Richard Hartman for appellant.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( Fred Kolikoff and Larry Sonnenshein of counsel), for respondents.



Order affirmed, with costs. We agree with the Appellate Division that the addition of the word "forthwith" to the statutory provisions in question does not alter the rule of Matter of Pierne v Valentine ( 291 N.Y. 333, 342) but, rather, only precludes an unnecessary or unwarranted delay which is not presented in this case.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER and TITONE.


Summaries of

Matter of Mahoney v. McGuire

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 8, 1985
485 N.E.2d 236 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Mahoney v. McGuire

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH F. MAHONEY, Appellant, v. ROBERT J. McGUIRE, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 8, 1985

Citations

485 N.E.2d 236 (N.Y. 1985)
485 N.E.2d 236
495 N.Y.S.2d 29

Citing Cases

Matter of McManus v. N.Y. City Emp. Retire

In any event, the Board of Trustees "was justified, if not obligated, to defer action upon petitioner's…

Matter of Degnan v. Constantine

As can be seen, had petitioners separated from service by voluntary withdrawal or resignation during the…