From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Maeder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 18, 1994
203 A.D.2d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 18, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Signorelli, S.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant personally.

To obtain summary judgment the movant must make a "prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issue[s] of fact" (Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324). Here, the petitioner made such a showing (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557). The appellant's opposing papers did not constitute sufficient proof to defeat the motion for summary judgment, because they consisted entirely of conclusory statements and unsubstantiated allegations (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, supra). Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Miller and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Maeder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 18, 1994
203 A.D.2d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Maeder

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of SERGE D. MAEDER, Deceased. CANDY S. KOSLOSKI, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 18, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 464 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 860

Citing Cases

In re Cassini

Christina filed objections to the account of the SNT, and subsequently moved for summary judgment granting…

Smith v. Staten Theatre Group

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The respondents, Staten Theatre Group and United Artists…