From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lydon v. N.Y. St. Div. of Housing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 6, 1990
158 A.D.2d 291 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

February 6, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.).


This court is cognizant that it will be a lengthy and costly process to transcribe the record of the 31-day hearing, as a result of which petitioners landlords were found liable for the intentional harassment of tenants. However, CPLR 7804 (e) requires, in pertinent part, that respondents "shall file with the answer a certified transcript of the record of the proceedings under consideration, unless such a transcript has already been filed with the clerk of the court", and there is no authority pursuant to which this mandate may be conditioned upon the posting of an undertaking by petitioners.

Respondents will, of course, be entitled to reimbursement upon prevailing in the CPLR article 78 proceeding. (See, Equity Invs. v Joy, 58 A.D.2d 539, lv denied 43 N.Y.2d 642; CPLR 8301.)

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Carro, Kassal and Wallach, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Lydon v. N.Y. St. Div. of Housing

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 6, 1990
158 A.D.2d 291 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Lydon v. N.Y. St. Div. of Housing

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THOMAS D. LYDON et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK STATE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 6, 1990

Citations

158 A.D.2d 291 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
550 N.Y.S.2d 698

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Robinson v. Finkel

However, it denied finality to that administrative process by failing to provide the required Record, which…