From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lugo v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 29, 1996
224 A.D.2d 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 29, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Clinton County.


Petitioner was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rule 113.12 ( 7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [iii]) prohibiting inmates from using controlled substances.

Petitioner's sole contention in this proceeding is that the positive test results could be attributable to his ingestion of cold medication given to him by other inmates. No further evidence was presented by him to buttress this contention. The Hearing Officer determined that petitioner violated prison disciplinary rule 113.12 on the basis of a misbehavior report, the results of two drug tests and petitioner's admission that he was taking unauthorized medication. The determination was based on substantial evidence and must be confirmed. The Hearing Officer was under no duty to make petitioner's case for him ( see, Matter of McMoore v. Leonardo, 198 A.D.2d 752).

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Lugo v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 29, 1996
224 A.D.2d 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Lugo v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PETER LUGO, Petitioner, v. THOMAS COUGHLIN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 29, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 896 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 928

Citing Cases

Matter of Patterson v. Goord

ct cell number and was signed by the correction officer who confiscated the pills, petitioner has failed to…