From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Lu Sane

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 15, 1991
590 A.2d 191 (N.J. 1991)

Opinion

May 15, 1991.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed a report with the Court, recommending that MELVIN D. LU SANE of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, be publicly reprimanded and required to practice under the supervision of a proctor for two years for failing to keep his client reasonably informed about the status of the case in violation of RPC 1.4(a), for failing to comply with his client's wish that he cease his representation of him in violation of RPC 1.16, for his failure to file an answer to the ethics complaint in violation of R. 1:20-3(i), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the report and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board are adopted and MELVIN D. LU SANE is hereby publicly reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall practice under the supervision of a proctor in accordance with Administrative Guideline No. 28 of the Office of Attorney Ethics for a period of two years; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall reimburse the Ethics Financial Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Lu Sane

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 15, 1991
590 A.2d 191 (N.J. 1991)
Case details for

In re Lu Sane

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF MELVIN D. LU SANE, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 15, 1991

Citations

590 A.2d 191 (N.J. 1991)
590 A.2d 191

Citing Cases

In re Vena

An attorney who continued representation of a client, despite having been discharged, received a reprimand.…

In re Howard

, In the Matter of William E. Wackowski, DRB 09-212 (November 25, 2009) (attorney permitted a complaint to be…