From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Queen Lace Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 9, 1997
243 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 9, 1997

Appeal from Workers' Compensation Board.


Claimant sustained a compensable back injury in March 1975. His case was closed in August 1978 following a finding of permanent partial disability and the payment of a lump-sum nonschedule adjustment in the amount of $8,000. The case was subsequently reopened based upon the representation of claimant's treating physician that there had been a change in claimant's medical condition involving, among other symptoms, an exacerbation of his back and neck pain. The Workers' Compensation Board ruled, however, that there had been no showing of a change in claimant's condition that was "not contemplated at the time of the adjustment" (Workers' Compensation Law § 15 [5-b]), with the result that claimant's case was closed. We affirm. Substantial evidence, including the negative results of an MRI test performed upon claimant's back together with the testimony of the physician who examined claimant on behalf of the Board, supports the ruling that claimant's medical condition had not worsened in an unanticipated manner warranting the award of additional benefits ( see generally, Matter of Cordell v. City of Oneida Youth Div., 146 A.D.2d 362).

Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Lopez v. Queen Lace Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Oct 9, 1997
243 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Lopez v. Queen Lace Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of VICTOR LOPEZ, Appellant, v. QUEEN LACE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Oct 9, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 768 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 344

Citing Cases

Claim of Thomas v. Crucible Materials Corp.

cal restrictions were similar to those existing when Smallman examined him in 2003. While claimant further…

Claim of Clark v. L H Window Erectors

Claimant contends on this appeal that the Board's decision was in error, as a matter of law, because it…