From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Longo v. Loeffler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 20, 1997
242 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

August 20, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Rosato, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The opportunity to ballot remedy is to be used only in exceptional cases where the defects in the designating petition are technical in nature ( see, Matter of Plunkett v. Mahoney, 76 N.Y.2d 848). The failure to timely file a certificate of authorization, which was required in order for there to be a valid designating petition in the instant matter ( see, Election Law § 6-120), constituted a "fatal defect" under Election Law § 1-106 (2), rather than a technical defect ( see, Matter of Plunkett v. Mahoney, supra). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly invalidated the petition for an opportunity to ballot.

Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Pizzuto, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Longo v. Loeffler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 20, 1997
242 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Longo v. Loeffler

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NICHOLAS A. LONGO et al., Respondents, v. MARY G…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 20, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
661 N.Y.S.2d 53

Citing Cases

Matter of Jobson v. Ingenito

On September 19, 1997, the petitioner timely commenced this proceeding to challenge the results of the…

MATTER OF DE CICCO v. CHEMUNG CTY. BD., ELEC. [3d Dept 1999

Following the invalidation of Trice's designating petition for failure to receive the required certificate of…