Opinion
February 17, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County [Edward McCarty, III, J.].
Respondent's determination that petitioner permitted its premises to become disorderly is supported by substantial evidence that the manager should have anticipated a disturbance given the large number of people he allowed into the premises, the live music, unlimited beer, and an inadequate staff that included only the manager and bartender (see, Matter of P.M. Entertainment Indus. v. State Liq. Auth., 114 A.D.2d 457, affd 67 N.Y.2d 834).
Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.