Opinion
March 24, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.).
The resettled order cured any infringement of appellant's partnership rights during winding up under Partnership Law § 51 (2) (c) by directing the sale of appellant's undivided one-half interest in the partnership rather than the sale of the property itself. This accords with Partnership Law § 54 (1), which allows an individual creditor to attach the interest of a partner in a partnership (see, Jones v. Palermo, 105 Misc.2d 405).
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Asch and Tom, JJ.