From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lodick v. City of Niagara Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1997
242 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

September 30, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Niagara County, Joslin, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Hayes, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.


Supreme Court properly granted respondents' motion to dismiss the CPLR article 78 petition seeking judgment compelling respondent City of Niagara Falls to pay severance benefits. Petitioner was appointed Administrative Assistant-City Administrator on December 20, 1995 and took the oath of office on December 29, 1995. On January 2, 1996, the new City Administrator notified petitioner that his position was terminated because it was eliminated from the 1996 budget. Pursuant to subdivisions (a) and (d) of Codified Ordinances of the City of Niagara Falls § 171.20, a City employee is qualified to receive severance pay if the employee is not covered by a collective bargaining agreement and has served the City for at least one year. Petitioner does not qualify for severance pay because he did not serve long enough in his exempt position.


Summaries of

Matter of Lodick v. City of Niagara Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 30, 1997
242 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Lodick v. City of Niagara Falls

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GEORGE J. LODICK, III, Appellant, v. CITY NIAGARA FALLS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 912 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
665 N.Y.S.2d 359