From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Livingston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 15, 1994
210 A.D.2d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

December 15, 1994

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Upon review of the record, we find that there is substantial evidence to support the Board's determination that claimant left his position as a bottling plant line worker without good cause for personal and noncompelling reasons. The evidence indicates that claimant resigned from his position and accepted a $10,000 payment from his employer as settlement of certain grievance and discrimination claims filed by claimant. Although claimant argued at the hearing that he quit because his employer threatened to fire him anyway, we note that, in his statement to the local office, claimant said that he "took the offer to resign because [he] was sick and tired of fighting" with his employer and "just wanted to get a new start". Under the circumstances, we find no reason to disturb the Board's conclusion that claimant voluntarily resigned in order to accept the employer's settlement payment.

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Livingston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 15, 1994
210 A.D.2d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Livingston

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of RICHARD A. LIVINGSTON, Appellant. JOHN F…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
620 N.Y.S.2d 177

Citing Cases

In re Gill

The employer now appeals.Under the circumstances presented, claimant's resignation and acceptance of the…

Gill v. Phx. Energy Mgmt. Inc.

The employer now appeals. Under the circumstances presented, claimant's resignation and acceptance of the…