From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lippmann v. Lippmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 346 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

May 5, 1997

Appeal from the Family Court, Queens County (Fitzmaurice, J.).


Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.

The evidence adduced at the hearing established, by competent proof, that the appellant willfully violated the order of protection ( see, Family Ct Act § 846-a; see also, Haber v. Haber, 225 A.D.2d 664; Graham v. Graham, 152 A.D.2d 653). Additionally, it was not an improvident exercise of discretion for the Family Court to sentence the appellant to six months incarceration for willful violation of the January 4, 1996, order ( see, Family Ct Act § 846-a; Matter of Arguinzoni v. Arguinzoni, 210 A.D.2d 324), and its issuance of a final order of protection was proper ( see, Family Ct Act § 656).

Miller, J.P., Sullivan, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Lippmann v. Lippmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 5, 1997
239 A.D.2d 346 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Lippmann v. Lippmann

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MIRIAM LIPPMANN, Respondent, v. DANNY LIPPMANN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 5, 1997

Citations

239 A.D.2d 346 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
657 N.Y.S.2d 989

Citing Cases

Rubackin v. Rubackin

With a citation to Matter of Tina T., the Appellate Division, Fourth Department has also referenced the…

Matter of Barcham-Reichman v. Reichman

ision suspending the sentence of incarceration upon the condition that the father serve six months of…