From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lindsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 14, 2006
32 A.D.3d 1077 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

September 14, 2006.

Per Curiam. Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1995, was suspended by this Court's order dated June 15, 2000 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a ( 273 AD2d 600).

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards, Albany, for petitioner.

Catherine A. Lindsey, New York City, respondent pro se.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ.


Respondent now requests reinstatement on the grounds that she has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) part 118. Petitioner does not object to respondent's application.

Respondent's application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Ordered that respondent's application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.


Summaries of

Matter of Lindsey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 14, 2006
32 A.D.3d 1077 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Matter of Lindsey

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 14, 2006

Citations

32 A.D.3d 1077 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 6466
820 N.Y.S.2d 532