From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lichtman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 1985
115 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

December 2, 1985


Respondent was admitted to practice by this court on September 14, 1983 under the name of Jay Robert Lichtman.

There are six allegations of misconduct pending against respondent. The first charge alleges that respondent is guilty of conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, in that respondent had appeared at a Municipal Court in New Jersey where, by virtue of his representation that he was a New York lawyer, he was allowed into a jail cell where he was later arrested and charged with criminal possession of methadone. The matter was remanded to the Municipal Court as a petit disorderly persons offense. When respondent was directed to appear at a hearing on the charge filed against him on January 8, 1985, he failed to so appear. By letter dated January 14, 1985 respondent was directed to appear on a new hearing date, February 19, 1985, and once again respondent failed to appear. As a result of his failure to appear the Municipal Court issued a bench warrant for respondent's arrest. Although advised by the Grievance Committee of the existence of the outstanding bench warrant, respondent failed to appear at the Municipal Court or to in any way communicate with that court.

The remaining charges, generally stated, involve respondent's neglect of a legal matter, to wit, an appeal entrusted to him, accepting a retainer in a legal matter which he knew or should have known he was not competent to handle, charging a clearly excessive fee, neglecting a matrimonial matter entrusted to him, and failing to cooperate with the investigation of the petitioner Grievance Committee.

The charges, if established, would require respondent's disbarment. Since he has chosen not to deny the charges and not even to appear in this proceeding, the charges must be deemed established. Petitioner's motion is therefore granted. Respondent is unfit to be a member of the Bar. He is disbarred and his name is ordered removed from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law, effective forthwith. Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Gibbons, Thompson and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Lichtman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 2, 1985
115 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Lichtman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAY R. LICHTMAN, an Attorney, Respondent. GRIEVANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 2, 1985

Citations

115 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)