From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lichorowic v. Lichorowic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 10, 1997
241 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

July 10, 1997

Appeal from the Family Court, Hamilton County (Feldstein, J.).


The parties were married in 1979 and have three children. Although not entirely clear from the record, it appears that petitioner commenced an action for divorce in 1994 and, in conjunction therewith, Supreme Court (Parker, J.) apparently issued mutual orders of protection in February 1995. Petitioner subsequently obtained a temporary order of protection from Family Court in April 1995 which, insofar as is relevant to this appeal, directed respondent to refrain from harassing petitioner. Thereafter, in August 1995, petitioner commenced this violation proceeding contending that respondent had violated various provisions of the temporary order of protection. Following a hearing, at which the parties appeared and testified, Family Court determined that respondent willfully violated the temporary order of protection and sentenced him to 45 days in jail. This appeal by respondent ensued.

Respondent apparently served approximately one week of his sentence before his motion for a stay pending appeal was granted by a Justice of this Court.

We affirm. Family Court Act § 846-a provides, in relevant part, that "[i]f a respondent is brought before the court for failure to obey any lawful order issued under [Family Court Act article 8] and if, after hearing, the court is satisfied by competent proof that the respondent has willfully failed to obey any such order, the court may * * * commit the respondent to jail for a term not to exceed six months". Based upon our review of the record as a whole, we are satisfied that there was sufficient evidence adduced at the hearing conducted in this matter to establish that respondent willfully violated Family Court's April 1995 temporary order of protection by engaging in conduct constituting the family offense of harassment. Respondent's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be lacking in merit.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Lichorowic v. Lichorowic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 10, 1997
241 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Lichorowic v. Lichorowic

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARY A. LICHOROWIC, Respondent, v. JOHN A. LICHOROWIC…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 10, 1997

Citations

241 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 1015

Citing Cases

Matter Leighton-Ryan v. Ryan

Respondent obtained a stay of Family Court's order and this appeal ensued. "In any Family Court Act family…

In re Chastity F

Respondent appeals. Respondent argues that there was insufficient proof to find that he willfully violated…