From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Liberman v. Katlowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 2000
269 A.D.2d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued January 21, 2000

February 28, 2000

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel inspection of corporate books and records, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty, J.), dated August 24, 1999, which dismissed the proceeding.

Stim Warmuth, P.C., Huntington, N.Y. (Joseph D. Stim and Glenn Warmuth of counsel), for appellant.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., DANIEL W. JOY, ANITA R. FLORIO, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the petition is reinstated.

The Supreme Court erred in concluding that the petitioner was unable to seek relief pursuant to CPLR article 78 (see, Berkowitz v. Astro Moving Stor. Co., 240 A.D.2d 450 ).


Summaries of

Matter of Liberman v. Katlowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 28, 2000
269 A.D.2d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of Liberman v. Katlowitz

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JULIE LIBERMAN, appellant, v. NEENA KATLOWITZ, respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 28, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 599 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 820