From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lewis v. Moskowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1989
149 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

April 3, 1989


Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

By order dated December 2, 1988, Justice Moskowitz denied the petitioner's pro se motion to vacate a judgment rendered April 1, 1987 (Moskowitz, J.), convicting him of six counts of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. That order, which was rendered prior to the return date of the instant petition, rendered this proceeding academic.

We note, furthermore, that a CPLR article 78 proceeding generally does not lie to review errors claimed to have occurred in a criminal proceeding (Matter of Hennessey v. Gorman, 58 N.Y.2d 806, 807). Inasmuch as there is no claim that the respondents lacked jurisdiction or authority to act in the underlying criminal action, the matter is inappropriate for CPLR article 78 treatment and the proceeding in the nature of prohibition must be dismissed (Matter of Greenberg v. Turner, 127 A.D.2d 909). Mollen, P.J., Thompson, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Lewis v. Moskowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 3, 1989
149 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of Lewis v. Moskowitz

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of THEODORE LEWIS, Petitioner, v. RUTH MOSKOWITZ et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 3, 1989

Citations

149 A.D.2d 419 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
539 N.Y.S.2d 508

Citing Cases

Garcha v. Cty. Court

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly determined that it lacked personal jurisdiction over the City Court.…