From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Leonard v. Melton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 2, 1977
58 A.D.2d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Opinion

June 2, 1977


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent revoking petitioner's operator's license. Early in the morning of August 13, 1974 petitioner was arrested by a Saratoga County Deputy Sheriff for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. His driver's license was subsequently revoked, after a hearing, for failure to submit to a chemical test pursuant to section 1194 Veh. Traf. of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. Petitioner maintains he was not driving a vehicle when arrested, a necessary prerequisite to a valid request to submit to a chemical test pursuant to section 1194 Veh. Traf. of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. Petitioner testified at the hearing that after consuming some beer he returned to his car, turned on the emergency blinker lights and fell asleep without starting the engine. The Deputy Sheriff drastically changed his initial version of what transpired but did testify that he found the petitioner slumped in the seat with his foot on the brake and detected an odor of alcohol. He further testified that the vehicle was partially on the highway with the lights on, that the motor was running and that the car was in gear. This conflicting testimony presented questions of fact and credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve. He implicitly accepted the testimony of the Deputy Sheriff, which on this record he had a right to do. This being so he could properly conclude that the Deputy Sheriff had a reasonable basis to conclude petitioner was operating the motor vehicle while intoxicated (Matter of Prudhomme v Hults, 27 A.D.2d 234). It follows, therefore, that the Deputy Sheriff properly asked petitioner to take the chemical test. The record also substantiates the finding that petitioner refused. Since there is substantial evidence in the record to support respondent's determination we must affirm (Matter of Williams v Tofany, 46 A.D.2d 708). Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Koreman, P.J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Main and Larkin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Leonard v. Melton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 2, 1977
58 A.D.2d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)
Case details for

Matter of Leonard v. Melton

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PAUL M. LEONARD, Petitioner, v. JAMES P. MELTON, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 2, 1977

Citations

58 A.D.2d 669 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977)

Citing Cases

People v. Key

Even if defendant had been intoxicated, there was still no observable traffic violation. With the engine not…

Matter of Smith v. Passidomo

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. The central…