Opinion
August 10, 1992
Appeal from the Family Court, Nassau County (Feiden, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant contends that the evidence presented at the hearing was insufficient to support the Family Court's finding that he willfully violated the order of protection. This contention is without merit. The evidence adduced at the hearing established, by competent proof, that the appellant willfully violated the order of protection (see, Family Ct Act § 846-a) when he went to the petitioner's residence without her permission, demanded money from her, and engaged in disruptive behavior (see, Matter of Leonetti v. Riehl, 154 A.D.2d 675, 676).
We have considered the appellant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, O'Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.