Opinion
April, 1915.
Order affirmed, without costs. The determination was within the discretion of the justice. He might well be reluctant to convict of contempt on ex parte papers, and he might well remit the creditor to the remedy of procuring the attendance of the debtor by attachment. (See Matter of Nejez, 54 Misc. Rep. 38.) Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Stapleton and Rich, JJ., concurred; Burr, J., not voting.