From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lee v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 16, 1993
195 A.D.2d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

July 16, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Lawton, Boomer and Boehm, JJ.


Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Respondents' determination is supported by substantial evidence. The Hearing Officer erred in failing to notify petitioner before issuing a determination that confidential information would be considered and in failing to articulate a reason for keeping that information confidential (see generally, Matter of Odom v. Kelly, 152 A.D.2d 1010; Matter of Freeman v. Coughlin, 138 A.D.2d 824, 825-826; Matter of Boyd v Coughlin, 105 A.D.2d 532, 533-534). We conclude that the error was harmless, however, because the contents of the confidential information were identical to a misbehavior report filed by a Correction Officer, which was part of the evidence at the hearing, and because the evidence, without considering the confidential information, was legally sufficient to sustain the charges (see, Matter of Boyd v. Coughlin, supra). Additionally, petitioner was found not guilty of possessing a weapon, which was the only charge to which the confidential report was relevant, and therefore he was not prejudiced by its use.


Summaries of

Matter of Lee v. Coughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 16, 1993
195 A.D.2d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Lee v. Coughlin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CALVIN LEE, Petitioner, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN, III, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 16, 1993

Citations

195 A.D.2d 997 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
600 N.Y.S.2d 559

Citing Cases

Perez v. Goord

The determination of guilt was upheld on administrative appeal, prompting this CPLR article 78 proceeding.…

Mitchell v. Rodriguez

Nor did the Hearing Officer err in denying petitioner's request to recall two investigating officers who had…