From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lech v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 11, 1997
242 A.D.2d 301 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

August 11, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The petitioners failed to offer any additional, material facts which existed at the time the prior motion was made but were not known to them or the court, and therefore we find that the petitioners' motion is correctly denominated a motion for leave to reargue, not renew ( Mangine v. Keller, 182 A.D.2d 476, 477; Matter of Jones v. Marcy, 135 A.D.2d 887). No appeal lies from an order denying reargument ( King v. Rockaway One Co., 202 A.D.2d 395, 396; Matter of Jones v. Marcy, 135 A.D.2d 887, supra; Matter of Kadish v. Colombo, 121 A.D.2d 722).

Bracken, J.P., Miller, Sullivan and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lech v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 11, 1997
242 A.D.2d 301 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Lech v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WLODEK LECH et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 11, 1997

Citations

242 A.D.2d 301 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
661 N.Y.S.2d 974

Citing Cases

Inzerillo v. City of New York

The plaintiff failed to offer any additional material facts which existed at the time the prior motion was…