From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Claim of Le Voff v. Gompers & Blau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 16, 1951
278 App. Div. 878 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

May 16, 1951.

Appeal from Workmen's Compensation Board.


Claimant's employment as an auditor required him to travel extensively during the major part of the year. In addition to a fixed weekly salary he was reimbursed for his living and transportation expenses incurred while at work away from his home, and these the board included in computing his prior annual earnings for the purpose of fixing his reduced earnings occasioned by his partial disability. Whether this was correct is the only question presented. Claimant's reimbursement for his transportation expenses may not properly be considered as in the nature of his earnings, albeit his living expenses were properly so treated. ( Matter of Rowe v. Kinney Co., 255 App. Div. 904, motion for leave to appeal denied 280 N.Y. 852.) Decisions and awards reversed, on the law, without costs, and the matter remitted to the Workmen's Compensation Board for a recomputation of claimant's reduced earnings and appropriate awards. Brewster, Deyo, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur; Foster, P.J., dissents.


Summaries of

Claim of Le Voff v. Gompers & Blau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 16, 1951
278 App. Div. 878 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Claim of Le Voff v. Gompers & Blau

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MAURICE S. LE VOFF, Respondent, against…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 16, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 878 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Citing Cases

Moorehead v. Industrial Commission

(Emphasis added).See also Thibeault v. General Outdoor Advertising Co., 114 Conn. 410, 158 A. 912 (1932);…