From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lawyer v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1995
212 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 14, 1995

Appeal from the Family Court, Suffolk County (Kent, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are premised on facts dehors the record and are, therefore, beyond review on this appeal. To the extent that the appellant claims that the hearing court placed undue weight on the results of the human leukocyte antigen blood test, we conclude that the court's determination of paternity was supported by all of the evidence at the hearing (see, Matter of Pandozy [Brenda UU.] v. Bruce VV., 136 A.D.2d 841). Bracken, J.P., Balletta, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Lawyer v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1995
212 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Lawyer v. Bradley

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of AMY LAWYER, Respondent, v. DAVID BRADLEY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
623 N.Y.S.2d 138

Citing Cases

People v. Efrain Santiago

20; People v Sturgis, 69 NY2d 816; People v Charles, 98 AD2d 780; People v Hansley, 88 AD2d 622). The…