From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lauria

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 11, 1963
18 A.D.2d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

January 11, 1963


Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. Following the decision in Matter of Shaw ( Lubin) ( 6 A.D.2d 354, affd. 5 N.Y.2d 1014) the Legislature, by chapter 783 of the Laws of 1960, amended the Labor Law (§ 593, subd. 1, par. [b]) to provide that a disqualification for benefits shall apply after a claimant's voluntary separation due to his marriage; or due to "following his spouse to another locality". Claimant's husband had moved from New York to Florida for his health and claimant, who had accompanied him, thereafter came back to work in New York where she had been previously employed. She later received sudden word that her husband had had a heart attack and, leaving her employment, she immediately went to Florida to be with him and to attend him. There is some issue about whether she was required to attend him all the time because a daughter was with him in the daytime; but it could be found that the wife in the interest of his health and care could reasonably wish to be with him nights. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board held that leaving of employment in these circumstances was for good cause. If a husband or wife is ill in the same neighborhood and reasonably needs the presence of the other spouse for care, leaving employment for this purpose could be found factually leaving for good cause. Good cause usually is regarded as a reason sufficient in ordinary circumstances of an urgent and personal nature to justify leaving employment; and the employee's own health or the health of close members of his family would ordinarily constitute such a justification. This is not merely "following a spouse to another locality" in the sense in which the Legislature used this clause which must be deemed, rather, a response to the Legislature's own view of the decision in the Shaw case. This language manifestly refers to leaving employment to go to another location with a spouse, no other sufficient reason being present. Decision affirmed, with costs to respondent. Bergan, P.J., Gibson, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur; Herlihy, J., concurs in the result.


Summaries of

Matter of Lauria

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 11, 1963
18 A.D.2d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Matter of Lauria

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of SHIRLEY S. LAURIA, Respondent. MARTIN P…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 11, 1963

Citations

18 A.D.2d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
236 N.Y.S.2d 168

Citing Cases

Matter of Russo

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT. Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board. This case is…

Matter of the Claim of Gangi

The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because…