From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Laureano v. Koch

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 2, 1985
479 N.E.2d 821 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued March 20, 1985

Decided April 2, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Sheldon S. Levy, J.

Andrew Scherer, Susan Barrie, Lucy Billings, John E. Kirklin, James C. Francis, IV, and Scott A. Rosenberg for appellants and intervenors-appellants.

Frederick A.O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel ( June A. Witterschein, Leonard Koerner and Jeffrey Schanback of counsel), for respondents.



Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, with directions to dismiss the proceeding for mootness. We decline to exercise our discretion to retain jurisdiction despite mootness ( see, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 718) for the reason that in this instance the City has in fact published regulations.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and KANE. Taking no part: Judge ALEXANDER.

Designated pursuant to N Y Constitution, article VI, § 2.


Summaries of

Matter of Laureano v. Koch

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 2, 1985
479 N.E.2d 821 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Laureano v. Koch

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARIA LAUREANO et al., Appellants, v. EDWARD I. KOCH, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 2, 1985

Citations

479 N.E.2d 821 (N.Y. 1985)
479 N.E.2d 821
490 N.Y.S.2d 185

Citing Cases

Johnson v. City of New York

Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy (Legal Aid Socy. v Ward, 91 A.D.2d 532, 534, affd 61 N.Y.2d 744) and an…

Union of City Tenants v. Koch

Respondents are not entitled to summary judgment, dismissing petitioners' claims. Petitioners have…