Matter of Latonia J. Dorothy J

3 Citing cases

  1. MATTER OF FARD G

    269 A.D.2d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

    ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. Since the appellant challenges an order which extended the child's placement with the Department of Social Services, the appeal is academic as the period of placement has expired (see, Matter of Latonia J., 249 A.D.2d 546; Matter of Carlos S., 243 A.D.2d 569;Matter of Ricardo R., 220 A.D.2d 431; Matter of Greg W., 213 A.D.2d 414).

  2. Matter of Sammy C

    254 A.D.2d 415 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)   Cited 1 times

    Therefore, the appeal from the order dated June 10, 1997, must be dismissed. Were we to reach the merits, we would find that since the petitioner seeks to challenge only so much of the order of disposition as placed him in a limited secure facility, the appeal is academic as the original period of placement has expired ( see, Matter of C. Children, 252 A.D.2d 523; Matter of Latonia J., 249 A.D.2d 546; Matter of Giovanni P., 236 A.D.2d 411) and the petitioner consented to the extension of placement in the limited secure facility. Rosenblatt, J. P., O'Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

  3. Matter of C. Children

    252 A.D.2d 523 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)   Cited 2 times

    Her appeal is directed only at the now-expired June 1996 determination extending placement. The mother's appeal is academic as the period of placement has expired ( see, Matter of Latonia J., 249 A.D.2d 546; Matter of Carlos S., 243 A.D.2d 569; Matter of Jamie EE., 232 A.D.2d 761; Matter of Ricardo R., 220 A.D.2d 431; Matter of Greg W., 213 A.D.2d 414; Matter of Antoine V.B., 204 A.D.2d 559, 560). Rosenblatt, J. P., O'Brien, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.