From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Lasher v. Primo Producing Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1929
227 App. Div. 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

September, 1929.


Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board, on the authority of Matter of Norris v. N.Y.C.R.R. Co. ( 246 N.Y. 307) ; Domres v. Syracuse Safe Co. ( 211 App. Div. 823; affd., 240 N.Y. 611); Bountiful Brick Co. v. Giles ( 276 U.S. 154, 158). Van Kirk, P.J., Hill and Hasbrouck, JJ., concur; Davis and Whitmyer, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and remit, on the ground that it is evident from the record that the period of labor of the deceased employee had not yet begun, and that the accident did not occur in the course of any of the duties he was directed or called upon to perform; that the testimony of the union organizer, Rothenstein, was not based upon facts within his knowledge, but upon hearsay, opinions and conclusions; it, therefore, furnished no corroboration of the alleged declarations of the decedent, or the basis of a finding that the accidental injuries arose out of and in the course of the employment. ( Matter of Case, 214 N.Y. 199.)


Summaries of

Matter of Lasher v. Primo Producing Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1929
227 App. Div. 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Matter of Lasher v. Primo Producing Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of ROSE LASHER, Respondent, against PRIMO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1929

Citations

227 App. Div. 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)