From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Larsen v. Canary

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 16, 1985
480 N.E.2d 747 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Decided May 16, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Paul J. Baisley, J.

Alan D. Oshrin for appellant.

Martin Bradley Ashare, County Attorney ( Roy Dragotta of counsel), for William Canary and another, constituting the Suffolk County Board of Elections, respondents, precluded.

John R. McNulty for Albert J. Krupski, respondent, precluded.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 107 A.D.2d 809). ( See also, Matter of Corrigan v Board of Elections, 38 A.D.2d 825, affd 30 N.Y.2d 603.)

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER.


Summaries of

Matter of Larsen v. Canary

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 16, 1985
480 N.E.2d 747 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

Matter of Larsen v. Canary

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ELLEN M. LARSEN, Appellant, v. WILLIAM CANARY et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 16, 1985

Citations

480 N.E.2d 747 (N.Y. 1985)
480 N.E.2d 747
491 N.Y.S.2d 159

Citing Cases

Testa v. Ravitz

Here, as a result of the Board of Elections' failure to act, no valid nomination has been made in accordance…

People v. Board of Elections City of N.Y

ORDERED that the order and judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, and…