From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of LaRose v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 17, 2000
271 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted February 14, 2000.

April 17, 2000.

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article, the father appeals from a order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Cooney, J.), entered April 22, 1997, which, after a hearing, dismissed his petition to modify a consent order of custody and visitation of the same court, entered March 28, 1996.

John A. Pappalardo, White Plains, N.Y., for appellant.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the father's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 ).


Summaries of

Matter of LaRose v. Wright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 17, 2000
271 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Matter of LaRose v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF MARK LaROSE, APPELLANT, v. JENNIFER WRIGHT, RESPONDENT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 17, 2000

Citations

271 A.D.2d 610 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 842

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Paul Michael L

ORDERED that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.…

In re Samantha

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Under the particular and unusual…