From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Lahm

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1918
119 N.E. 1052 (N.Y. 1918)

Opinion

Argued February 27, 1918

Decided March 19, 1918

I. Maurice Wormser and Herman C. Pollack for appellant.

Otto A. Samuels for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, CARDOZO, POUND and ANDREWS, JJ.


Summaries of

In re Lahm

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 19, 1918
119 N.E. 1052 (N.Y. 1918)
Case details for

In re Lahm

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of ISAAC LAHM et al., Respondents, for an…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 19, 1918

Citations

119 N.E. 1052 (N.Y. 1918)
119 N.E. 1052

Citing Cases

Richard v. National Transportation Co., Inc.

" ( Fairbanks v. Sargent, 117 N.Y. 320, at pp. 336, 337.) (See, also, Jones v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 90…