From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

La France v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 14, 1978
64 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

September 14, 1978


Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered December 5, 1977 in Clinton County, which dismissed petitioner's application in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. Petitioner, an inmate at the Clinton Correctional Facility, commenced this article 78 proceeding claiming that he was transferred to the general population of the facility without having had the benefit of any test or evaluations pertaining to his classification and that he had made two requests to a senior counselor to review his records under the Freedom of Information Act which went unanswered. Section 139 Correct. of the Correction Law provides for procedures through which persons within correctional institutions are to resolve their grievances. Petitioner has failed to utilize such procedures. Special Term properly dismissed his petition on the basis that he failed to exhaust available administrative remedies (Matter of Barhite v Dyson, 63 A.D.2d 1051; Matter of Fleming v Cagliostro, 53 A.D.2d 187, mot for lv to app den 40 N.Y.2d 806; Matter of Barnes v La Vallee, 45 A.D.2d 978). The judgment, therefore, should be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J.P., Staley, Jr., Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

La France v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 14, 1978
64 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

La France v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DOUGLAS LA FRANCE, Appellant, v. BENJAMIN WARD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 14, 1978

Citations

64 A.D.2d 989 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

People ex Rel. Williams v. Ward

Under such circumstances, the inmate's due process rights are adequately protected and no impermissible…

Matter of Scott v. Smith

These new averments may not now be considered by this court (Nolan v. County of Otsego, 55 A.D.2d 422).…