From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

La Bounty v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 21, 1995
222 A.D.2d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 21, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County.


Petitioner, a prison inmate, was involved in an incident in which he made racist accusations regarding the grievance procedure and the grievance coordinator in the presence of a group of inmates and encouraged them to chant "we're with you". As a result, he was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting an inmate from urging other inmates to engage in actions detrimental to the order of the facility. Petitioner contends that this determination is not supported by substantial evidence and was made in retaliation for his having filed a grievance. We are unpersuaded. The misbehavior report, combined with the testimony of the grievance coordinator, provides substantial evidence supporting the determination. Petitioner has failed to advance proof to substantiate his claim that the determination was made in retaliation for his filing of a grievance.

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

La Bounty v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 21, 1995
222 A.D.2d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

La Bounty v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MARK LA BOUNTY, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 21, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 761

Citing Cases

Matter of Mays v. Goord

In any event, petitioner's contention is without merit inasmuch as the record indicates that the requested…

Matter of Hendricks v. Selsky

Substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report and the testimony of the administrator supports…