From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kusel v. Eastern Bridle Iron Steel Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 11, 1940
28 N.E.2d 400 (N.Y. 1940)

Opinion

Argued May 21, 1940

Decided June 11, 1940

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

George S. Collins for appellants.

John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General ( Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for State Industrial Board, respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ. LEHMAN, Ch. J., and SEARS, J., dissent on the ground that there is neither finding nor testimony that the injury was caused by an accident.


Summaries of

Matter of Kusel v. Eastern Bridle Iron Steel Corp.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 11, 1940
28 N.E.2d 400 (N.Y. 1940)
Case details for

Matter of Kusel v. Eastern Bridle Iron Steel Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MORRIS KUSEL, Respondent, against EASTERN…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 11, 1940

Citations

28 N.E.2d 400 (N.Y. 1940)
28 N.E.2d 400

Citing Cases

Matter of LaFountain v. LaFountain

These facts amply sustained the finding of an accidental injury resulting in death. ( Matter of Kusel v.…