From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kuczka v. Clark

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 14, 1982
445 N.E.2d 204 (N.Y. 1982)

Summary

interpreting a section of New York's Civil Service Law

Summary of this case from State v. Shabazz

Opinion

Argued November 12, 1982

Decided December 14, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, VINCENT E. DOYLE, JR., J.

Barbara R. Heck James for appellant.

Eugene F. Pigott, Jr., County Attorney ( Justyn E. Miller of counsel), for respondent.



Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 86 A.D.2d 980). Nor do we find any basis to disturb the determination implicit in the disposition in that court that appellant's allegations of delay on the part of respondent commissioner in establishing the civil service list do not provide equitable grounds for the relief that he seeks.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.


Summaries of

Matter of Kuczka v. Clark

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 14, 1982
445 N.E.2d 204 (N.Y. 1982)

interpreting a section of New York's Civil Service Law

Summary of this case from State v. Shabazz
Case details for

Matter of Kuczka v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KENNETH A. KUCZKA, Appellant, v. JOHN V. CLARK, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 14, 1982

Citations

445 N.E.2d 204 (N.Y. 1982)
445 N.E.2d 204
459 N.Y.S.2d 28

Citing Cases

State v. Shabazz

Age designations in a variety of other contexts have also received significant comment. See, e.g., New York…

Doyle v. Suffolk County

The New York courts have interpreted the quoted phrase to apply to any person who has had a 29th birthday.…