Argued June 8, 1917
Decided July 11, 1917
William H. Foster for appellants.
Egburt E. Woodbury, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken, of counsel), for respondent.
Order affirmed, with costs, on authority of Matter of De Noyer v. Cavanaugh ( 221 N.Y. 273); no opinion.
Concur: CHASE, COLLIN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.
Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MAIMI KUCHARUK, Respondent, v . WILLIAM C…
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jul 11, 1917
Despite its disclaimer, this record clearly reveals that defendant hired Thoms in the fall of 1986, subject…
Mandatto v. Hudson Shoring Co.While there was no agreement to pay him in money for the service rendered, yet he was to receive the use of…