From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Krysheena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1999
265 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

October 1, 1999

Appeal from Order of Jefferson County Family Court, Hunt, J. — Adoption.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Family Court properly dispensed with the consent of respondent to the adoption of his children pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 111 (2) (a). Neither the order of protection prohibiting respondent from contacting the children nor his incarceration prevented him from contacting the persons having legal custody of the children, or the Jefferson County Department of Social Services, the agency maintaining supervision of respondent and the children (see, Domestic Relations Law § 111 [a]; Matter of Naticia Q., 226 A.D.2d 755; Matter of Charmaine T., 173 A.D.2d 625, 627). "The parent who has been prohibited from direct contact with the child[ren], in the child[ren]'s best interest, continues to have an obligation to maintain contact with the person[s] having legal custody of the child[ren] (see, Domestic Relations Law § 111 [a]). Failure to do so is a clear manifestation of an intent to forego parental obligations to the child[ren]" (Matter of Paul S., 170 Misc.2d 750, 753; see also, Matter of Ulysses T., 87 A.D.2d 998, 999, affd 66 N.Y.2d 773).

PRESENT: GREEN, J. P., LAWTON, PIGOTT, JR., SCUDDER AND BALIO, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Krysheena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1999
265 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Krysheena

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF KRYSHEENA. MATTER OF ZACKERY. MATTER OF BAMBI C.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
695 N.Y.S.2d 469

Citing Cases

In re Gabrielle HH.

To hold otherwise permits the parent, by this refusal, to commit the child to a future of impermanence"…

In the Matter of Jasmin E.R

Initially, we note that, because respondent mother has not taken an appeal from the order, any issue…