From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Krupczak v. Mancini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 21, 1987
133 A.D.2d 288 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

August 21, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Montgomery County (White, J.).


Due to the fact that petitioner is not a member of the Republican Party and her challenge is based on claimed defects in party procedure, she lacks standing to challenge the validity of the certificates of authorization at issue (see, Matter of Wydler v. Cristenfeld, 35 N.Y.2d 719; Matter of Bennett v. Justin, 77 A.D.2d 960, affd 51 N.Y.2d 722). The judgment should therefore be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Casey, Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Krupczak v. Mancini

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Aug 21, 1987
133 A.D.2d 288 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Matter of Krupczak v. Mancini

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NORBERTA F. KRUPCZAK, Appellant, v. ALBERT MANCINI et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Aug 21, 1987

Citations

133 A.D.2d 288 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Nicolai v. Kelleher

Here, although Nicolai is seeking election to the same office as the respondent candidates nominated by the…

In the Matter of Gross v. Hoblock

We cannot agree. To be sure, this Court previously has held that a candidate of one party has no standing to…