From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kriegman v. Dumphy

City Court of New York, Special Term
Feb 1, 1910
66 Misc. 221 (N.Y. City Ct. 1910)

Opinion

February, 1910.

Nathaniel Tonkin, for judgment creditor.

Holmes Jones, for Richard J. Dumphy.


The judgment recovered is against the defendant in his representative capacity and obtained pursuant to the provision of section 1919, Code of Civil Procedure. Upon such a judgment proceedings supplementary to execution may not be maintained. Code Civ. Pro., §§ 1921, 2458. It would seem that the only relief afforded a plaintiff recovering a judgment against an attorney in fact representing several individuals as underwriters of the New York and New England Underwriters at Lloyds of New York city is by action against the individuals pursuant to section 1922, Code of Civil Procedure.

Motion to vacate subpœna granted. No costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Kriegman v. Dumphy

City Court of New York, Special Term
Feb 1, 1910
66 Misc. 221 (N.Y. City Ct. 1910)
Case details for

Matter of Kriegman v. Dumphy

Case Details

Full title:Matter of Proceedings Supplementary, HARRY KRIEGMAN, Plaintiff and…

Court:City Court of New York, Special Term

Date published: Feb 1, 1910

Citations

66 Misc. 221 (N.Y. City Ct. 1910)
122 N.Y.S. 1116