Opinion
March 13, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCabe, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
A review of the record discloses that, contrary to the appellant's contention, the trial court gave Eugene J. Schmidt, Sr. (hereinafter Schmidt) a full and fair opportunity to be heard, and it rendered its judgment after giving due consideration to the credible testimony of the parties and to the admissible evidence.
Contrary to the appellant's contention, the provisions of the parties' stipulation of settlement and the qualified domestic relations order entered August 27, 1993, concerning the defendant's interest in Schmidt's pension benefits are consistent with each other. Balletta, J.P., O'Brien, Thompson and Ritter, JJ., concur.