In contrast, a motion to vacate a default presents factual questions not previously passed upon by the administrative agency. By seeking to vacate the default, petitioner was simply availing herself of the Authority's own invitation under its procedures to present new facts supporting her reasons for the default and to proffer a meritorious defense (see, Davis v. Kingsbury, supra, 30 A.D.2d, at 945 [noting that a second application may toll statute of limitations "where a different factual presentation is invited by the authority in question"]; cf.,Matter of Koukla, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Auth., 37 A.D.2d 955, 956). Because petitioner's application to vacate the default created a "fresh situation," it cannot be considered a motion to reconsider a prior determination (Matter of Koukla, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Auth.,supra, 37 A.D.2d, at 956).