From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Konigsberg v. Scheinman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 12, 1982
87 A.D.2d 703 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

March 12, 1982


Motion by respondent to dismiss petition on objections in point of law granted, and petition dated January 9, 1982 dismissed. The extraordinary remedy of prohibition does not lie to review matters such as the alleged bias or prejudice of a Trial Judge where such matters can be raised on direct appeal from the judgment of conviction ( Matter of Lucas v. Scheinman, 83 A.D.2d 969). Mahoney, P.J., Kane, Yesawich, Jr., Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Konigsberg v. Scheinman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 12, 1982
87 A.D.2d 703 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Matter of Konigsberg v. Scheinman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HAROLD KONIGSBERG, Petitioner, v. LOUIS B. SCHEINMAN, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 12, 1982

Citations

87 A.D.2d 703 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Matter of Corporation v. Greenfield

Also, respondent did not act in excess of authority or without jurisdiction in this matter so as to warrant a…