From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kominski

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1977
366 N.E.2d 81 (N.Y. 1977)

Opinion

Argued April 29, 1977

Decided June 2, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Irving Jorrisch, Samuel A. Hirshowitz and Murray Sylvester of counsel), for appellant.

Anthony J. Gigliotti, for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

We agree with the Appellate Division that the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board misinterpreted and misapplied subdivision 2 of section 598 of the Labor Law (L 1972, ch 396). The statute by its terms only applies when the Secretary of Labor of the United States finds that the application of subdivision 1 (Labor Law, § 598) is in conflict with the requirements of Federal law.

The history of the statute, as traced by the Appellate Division in its opinion, indicates that this was the sole intent of the Legislature in enacting subdivision 2. Since the Secretary of Labor made no finding as contemplated by the statute, there was no basis for recoupment of the moneys paid to the claimant.

Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Matter of Kominski

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 2, 1977
366 N.E.2d 81 (N.Y. 1977)
Case details for

Matter of Kominski

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of NICHOLAS KOMINSKI, Respondent. LOUIS L…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 2, 1977

Citations

366 N.E.2d 81 (N.Y. 1977)
366 N.E.2d 81
397 N.Y.S.2d 381

Citing Cases

Snead v. Unemployment Ins. Appeal Bd.

We also note that without the implicit fairness requirement for recoupment of nonfraudulent payments, the…