From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kolanda v. Brunner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 9, 1967
27 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

March 9, 1967


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court which denied petitioner's motion to dismiss certain charges against him in a police department disciplinary action. Petitioner contends that respondents have not adequately responded to the court's orders and judgments requiring bills of particulars to amplify the specifications against him. It is our view, however, that insofar as they are amplified by the second bill of particulars, the charges appear adequate at this point, but can better be assessed in light of the proof adduced after the proceeding is had. CPLR 7801 provides that an article 78 proceeding can not be used to challenge a determination "which is not final". The authorities relied upon by petitioner are all cases where review of the charges was had on review of the whole case, a remedy petitioner will be entitled to here pursuant to section 188-g of the Village Law. Order affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P.J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Aulisi, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Kolanda v. Brunner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 9, 1967
27 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Matter of Kolanda v. Brunner

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALAN KOLANDA, Appellant, v. JOHN R. BRUNNER, as Mayor of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1967

Citations

27 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

Matter of Kolanda v. Pembridge

The evidence against petitioner consisted solely of the testimony of the youths allegedly involved with him.…

Matter of Jerry v. Bd. of Educ

Final determination will be made in this matter, not by the hearing panel, but by the respondent board…