From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Koenig v. Britt

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 10, 1911
96 N.E. 1118 (N.Y. 1911)

Opinion

Argued October 3, 1911

Decided October 10, 1911

Herbert R. Limburg, A.S. Gilbert and Albert S. Bard for appellant.

Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel ( Abram I. Elkus, Terence Farley and George P. Nicholson of counsel), for respondents.

D-Cady Herrick for Democratic State Committee, intervening.


The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and that of the Special Term in substance affirmed, without costs. There are some errors, however, in the form of the Special Term order, for which reason it must be modified, and the order for this may be settled on two days' notice before the chief judge of this court.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., HAIGHT, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Koenig v. Britt

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 10, 1911
96 N.E. 1118 (N.Y. 1911)
Case details for

Matter of Koenig v. Britt

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Application of SAMUEL S. KOENIG, Appellant, v . J…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 10, 1911

Citations

96 N.E. 1118 (N.Y. 1911)
96 N.E. 1118