From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Knieriemen Oil Company v. Lane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1963
19 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Opinion

October 28, 1963


In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act: (1) to annul determinations of the respondent Building Inspector and of the respondent Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Poughkeepsie denying petitioners' application for a variance to permit the construction and maintenance of fuel storage tanks; (2) to declare illegal the 1956 amended Town Zoning Ordinance and Building Inspection Ordinance; and (3) for other relief, petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated June 14, 1963, which denied their motion "for leave to renew and reargue" their petition as amended. Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No new or additional facts were presented in the affidavit submitted in support of the motion; therefore it was in fact one for reargument of the prior application. An order denying a motion for reargument is not appealable ( Sellet v. City of Yonkers, 13 A.D.2d 976; Leckey v. McQuade, 13 A.D.2d 682; Polito v. Town of Babylon, 5 A.D.2d 877). Ughetta, Acting P.J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Knieriemen Oil Company v. Lane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 28, 1963
19 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)
Case details for

Matter of Knieriemen Oil Company v. Lane

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of KNIERIEMEN OIL COMPANY et al., Appellants, v. ROBERT A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 28, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Kaplan v. Nadler

Such motion, therefore, was in fact a motion for reargument of the prior application. An order denying a…