From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Knapp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 1986
119 A.D.2d 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

April 14, 1986

Appeal from the Surrogate's Court, Dutchess County (Benson, S.).


Decree modified, on the facts, by deleting the word "uncontrolled" from the second decretal paragraph. As so modified, decree affirmed, with costs payable by the appellant.

The will clearly and unambiguously grants the executor or the trustee the power to sell the testatrix's real property if he should deem it absolutely necessary. Thus, the decision to sell or retain the subject real property is committed to the sound discretion of the executor or the trustee. Because the intent of the testatrix can be gleaned from the four corners of the will, the Surrogate's exclusion of extrinsic evidence at the will construction hearing was proper (see, Matter of Cord, 58 N.Y.2d 539, 544). However, we believe that the testatrix did not intend that the power to sell the real property was "uncontrolled", as the Surrogate held. Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Knapp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 1986
119 A.D.2d 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Matter of Knapp

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Estate of AMALIE W. KNAPP, Deceased. CATHERINE T…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 14, 1986

Citations

119 A.D.2d 676 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

PETITION FOR THE CONSTR. OF LAST WILL OF BAUER

The guardian ad litem for Francesca Pisano (an infant) has filed a report in response to the petition. The…

Matter of the Estate of Florio

This intent must be gleaned not from a single word or phrase but from a sympathetic reading of the will in…