From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Klugh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 29, 1916
176 App. Div. 187 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

December 29, 1916.

Charles P. Hallock, for the appellants.

Charles E. Thorn, for the respondents.


The surviving executor of the estate of Henry A. Klugh, deceased, and the executrix of the deceased executrix of said estate, have moved to vacate a decree of the Surrogate's Court dated September 12, 1904, judicially settling the accounts of the then executors of the said estate, and to reopen said proceeding and take proof of, and correct, the errors claimed to exist in the said account.

While it may fairly be said that the excuse offered for the delay in seeking the relief sought is not very convincing, and while no good reason has been shown for reopening the account and relieving the accounting executors from the items for the sale of the Pennsylvania realty and the amount of the Ward mortgage, still it does appear clearly that a clerical error was made in the computations in Schedule B of said account, as the result of which the executors were only credited with the sum of $288.65 when in fact the sum with which they should have been credited was $558.41, leaving an amount by which they were erroneously overcharged of $269.76. That this was a mere clerical mistake is apparent from an inspection of the account and the respondents are unable to show that it is anything save a patent error.

The order appealed from will, therefore, be modified, so that while it denies the application to reopen the proceeding and take proof as to the items of $600 and $202.37, it will grant the application to the extent of crediting the accounting executors with the sum of $269.76 in addition to the credits heretofore given them by the decree, the failure to credit such sum to them being due to clerical mistake and an error in computation, and as so modified the order will be affirmed, without costs to either party.

CLARKE, P.J., McLAUGHLIN, LAUGHLIN and DAVIS, JJ., concurred.

Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.


Summaries of

Matter of Klugh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 29, 1916
176 App. Div. 187 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Matter of Klugh

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of LAURA A. KLUGH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1916

Citations

176 App. Div. 187 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
162 N.Y.S. 543

Citing Cases

Matter of Garrabrant

The record is voluminous and it is unnecessary to discuss the evidence, but only to indicate the issues on…