From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Klenofsky v. Leviss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 13, 1989
156 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

December 13, 1989


Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioners herein commenced an action, inter alia, to declare that a deed dated June 12, 1964, which conveyed to Edgar J. Allen all the right, title and interest of the petitioner Ezra Klenofsky in the subject premises, was null and void. After Allen failed to appear, the petitioners herein moved for leave to enter a default judgment. The Supreme Court, Queens County (Leviss, J.), issued an ex parte memorandum decision dated May 1, 1989, in which he denied the petitioners' motion for leave to enter a default judgment. With respect to the petitioners' claim of ownership by virtue of the doctrine of adverse possession, the court found that there had been no hostile possession taken under claim of right by the petitioners, inasmuch as the petitioner Fay Klenofsky was entitled to reside on the real property and her husband Ezra Klenofsky resided there because of the spousal relationship.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus lies to compel the performance of a purely ministerial act where there is a clear legal right to the relief sought (see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16). Inasmuch as that is not the case in this instance, the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed. Rubin, J.P., Eiber, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Klenofsky v. Leviss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 13, 1989
156 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

Matter of Klenofsky v. Leviss

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EZRA KLENOFSKY et al., Petitioners, v. SIDNEY J. LEVISS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1989

Citations

156 A.D.2d 520 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
548 N.Y.S.2d 784

Citing Cases

Sugarman v. Malone

While plaintiff and Malone, whose spouses were siblings, may not be related to each other in any conventional…