Opinion
Submitted May 22, 1916
Decided June 16, 1916
The fact that in the report of this case in 216 N.Y., at page 89, there is a misprint, has led the respondents to move for a re-argument. The phrase "in consequence of the death of the grantor," should read, "in contemplation of the death of the grantor."
The motion should be denied, with ten dollars costs.
All concur.
Motion denied.